@littlecalculist waiting for the minutes then :)
-
-
Replying to @qmx
@qmx tl;dr: new standard symbol @@unscopeable that can be added to an object with array of property names for `with` to ignore1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich @unwithable@qmx Deliberately left `with` out of the name b/c useful for new Node properties that pollute event handler scopes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist
@littlecalculist@qmx example? DOM event handlers survived 18 yrs w/o.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@qmx Hm, maybe it won't be a problem in practice since won't be in a nested scope?@annevk said it was wanted, should ask him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist
@littlecalculist@BrendanEich@qmx we keep running into problems with event handlers.@bz_moz can tell you too. For find() this seems great.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annevk
@annevk@littlecalculist@BrendanEich@qmx We've thought about freezing/limiting the property names event handlers pick up from the node.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz@littlecalculist@BrendanEich@qmx this@TC39 thing is basically that, but through a blacklist and developer-exposed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BrendanEich @annevk @littlecalculist @qmx @TC39 There were some; I don't recall what they were, unfortunately. :( Search bugs and lists?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.