Sorry, I'm being loose with terminology. It's "pointing at"; we specifically avoid creating selections for security. find-in-page via url is apt, though with more disambiguating power. We've thought about integrating it with the FIP UI but haven't yet (more of a UI issue though)
Ah, I see. So the major differentiator between our (user-focused) use cases and the list there is the search engine use case. That seems to be driving a lot of the design here, as far as I can see. OK, at least I understand where you're coming from now.
@t
-
-
What do other search engines of note want? Maybe they want the same thing but I can't tell. Cc:
@yegg@ericlaw for Bing (lol),@konarkmodi for Cliqz,@nitot for Qwant. -
AFAICT, Bing was happy with this proposal. I've personally been missing this since IE5 or whatever. :)https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/internet-explorer/ie-developer/platform-apis/ms536641(v%3Dvs.85) …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.