Happy to review a PR! Would indeed welcome a more active co-editor though. Took over since there hasn’t been an editor at all for some time and try to fix issues when ever I get time to. PRs would be really helpful.
-
-
-
I can't write a PR, because I have no idea what the spec is trying to say! And I can't reverse-engineer it from first principles, because the spec never says what these matrices do on vectors in coordinate-free term or how the mutation methods affect those actions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sigh. Someone else needs to take that draft over. I can poke at individual things, but I'm too overcommitted to become a permanent editor, unfortunately.

-
What really needs to happen is for someone who thinks they know what's going on to document what these things _mean_, not just the algorithms applied to them. Then it would be way easier to fix the algorithms to match the now-known meaning.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.