The idea that the "single function" of @DavidAFrench @kmele and @thomaschattwill is to usher in the worst ideologies of the left is preposterous, @realchrisrufopic.twitter.com/5Usk4J4Tza
-
I did, though it's been awhile. More to the point: those writers serve many functions, and prominent among them are advancing numerous important rebuttals to some of the worst ideologies on the left. French has filed lawsuits against what you would call CRT.
Obviously they serve many functions and have different views, but *the argument they lay out in the NYT op-ed,* in practice, serves a single function. That's the clear point if you read the piece. You're misrepresenting it, which is not your style usually.
-
-
Your email does not qualify your observation in that way. Even so qualified, I still find the claim preposterous. Here is a paragraph from that oped:pic.twitter.com/5UOrDn752K
-
One wonders how that paragraph has the single function of ushering in the left's worst ideologies... because it obviously doesn't do that at all.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is where you go off the rails and, ultimately, damage your cause. At root, you and the oped authors agree on eradicating harmful curricula. But bc y’all see propose different solutions, you resort to labels/sloganeering and accuse them of actively aiding “the Left.” (1/2)
-
Anyone who follows David French can see that’s plainly not the case, but you’re banking that those who don’t follow him will take your word for it. It’s a cynical move that suggests you aren’t serious about the problem you—and they!— are trying to solve. (2/2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.