Im not sure I'm a centrist (politically, I've been in exile for some time in this country), but I'll take a stab at a good faith response to Chris.https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1413210996936626176 …
-
-
I missed this New Yorker piece, so I'll read it later. Public persuasion can be compatible with the truth but also stands in deep tension with it (see e.g., Plato). I think this strategy brings those tensions to the foreground.
-
But the deeper disagreement remains. I don't think it's democratic to ban ideas; I don't think it improves discourse to prevent people with certain theoretical/practical commitments from entering it. Plenty of folks would like to silence me.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Trading specificity for ambiguity does a few things: -It makes the discourse incoherent -It makes communication impossible -It invites abuse and obfuscation -it makes error correction impossible -it reduces everything to a power game -it empowers demagogues over honest brokers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a heinous admission on your part of a deliberate massive conflation. Did you study at the Ayn Rand Institute Chris?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.