Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ on Twitter: "You claimed that you couldn't teach James Baldwin in Tennessee, which is simply not a correct reading of the law. (Courts ultimately get to decide what's "impartial," as they do with all other laws that have definitions in them. That's how our system works.)… https://t.co/Cn46fUPsty"

Country	Code	For customers of
United States	40404	(any)
Canada	21212	(any)
United Kingdom	86444	Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
Brazil	40404	Nextel, TIM
Haiti	40404	Digicel, Voila
Ireland	51210	Vodafone, O2
India	53000	Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
Indonesia	89887	AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
Italy	4880804	Wind
3424486444	Vodafone
» See SMS short codes for other countries

Christopher F. Rufo ‏ @realchrisrufo Jul 5

Replying to @cvaldary @thomaschattwill and

Christopher F. Rufo Retweeted Christopher F. Rufo

https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1412139605319569413 …

Christopher F. Rufo added,

Christopher F. Rufo @realchrisrufo

Replying to @kmele @wokal_distance and 3 others

"File a federal civil rights lawsuit" puts an enormous onus on parents; state legislation puts the onus on the public school, where it should be. The reality is that this kind of pedagogy is widespread, *despite existing civil rights laws.* New problems require new solutions.

3 replies 9 retweets 69 likes

Chloé S. Valdary ‏Verified account @cvaldary Jul 5

Replying to @realchrisrufo @thomaschattwill and

Chloé S. Valdary Retweeted Jeffrey Sachs

My sense is that these bans will not actually result in cultural change and so do not produce sustained change. There's also a precedent for fighting against racist ideas in schools which is written about here:https://twitter.com/JeffreyASachs/status/1412222982940942338?s=20 …

Chloé S. Valdary added,

Jeffrey Sachs @JeffreyASachs

Replying to @kmele @realchrisrufo

It's instructive to note that back when the KKK and likeminded parents actually were writing textbooks and designing curriculum, it wasn't the law that defeated them. https://twitter.com/JeffreyASachs/status/1410250498465308676 …

4 replies 0 retweets 27 likes

Chloé S. Valdary ‏Verified account @cvaldary Jul 5

Replying to @cvaldary @realchrisrufo and

Also @realchrisrufo some of these bills are...absolutely horrendous and also seem to be in violation of the Constitution, which, you know, would be really ironic given the pro-America spirit that is motivating the fight.https://www.arcdigital.media/p/laws-aimed-at-banning-critical-race …

3 replies 6 retweets 23 likes

Christopher F. Rufo ‏ @realchrisrufo Jul 5

Replying to @cvaldary @thomaschattwill and

You're moving the goalposts. They already *are* creating cultural change and we'll litigate the specific texts in the states over time and, if necessary, revise them. But the deeper question remains: who gets to decide what happens in public schools? Voters or bureaucrats?

4 replies 16 retweets 97 likes

Chloé S. Valdary ‏Verified account @cvaldary Jul 5

Replying to @realchrisrufo @thomaschattwill and

They're not creating cultural change if the bans in question are as unconstitutional as the curricula they seek to prohibit. And the dichotomy you present is false. The voters in question are state legislatures effectively banning books. That is bureaucracy and it is tyranny.

3 replies 2 retweets 20 likes

Christopher F. Rufo ‏ @realchrisrufo Jul 5

Replying to @cvaldary @thomaschattwill and

Every sentence here is wrong: they aren't unconstitutional; the dichotomy is the state of play right now; they are not banning books, they are banning racist pedagogies; it's not tyranny to restrict the power of the state to indoctrinate children into a racialist ideology.

7 replies 19 retweets 113 likes

Chloé S. Valdary ‏Verified account @cvaldary Jul 5

Replying to @realchrisrufo @thomaschattwill and

Chris have you read the texts of the bans being passed? Have you read the Tennessee bill? Or Oklahoma? Or Texas? Please explain how banning the mere "inclusion" of certain topics in curriculum is not tyrannical?

7 replies 2 retweets 20 likes

Chloé S. Valdary ‏Verified account @cvaldary Jul 5

Replying to @cvaldary @realchrisrufo and

Tennessee bill: Note the words "shall not include." This is tantamount to an English lit teacher not being able to include books like Huckleberry Fin, or 'I know why the caged bird sings' merely because they both "include" this historical context.pic.twitter.com/9do80a87hd

12 replies 1 retweet 23 likes

Christopher F. Rufo ‏ @realchrisrufo Jul 5

Replying to @cvaldary @thomaschattwill and

No, it's not at all. Keep reading to *the following section* and you'll see how your legal interpretation is completely wrong. You've been tricked to believe "they're banning teaching about history" by bad faith opponents to these bills.pic.twitter.com/EPyIrStL4q

8 replies 11 retweets 66 likes

Chloé S. Valdary ‏Verified account @cvaldary Jul 5

Replying to @realchrisrufo @thomaschattwill and

Chris who here gets to dictate what's impartial and what's not?

3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes

Christopher F. Rufo ‏ @realchrisrufo Jul 5

Replying to @cvaldary @thomaschattwill and

You claimed that you couldn't teach James Baldwin in Tennessee, which is simply not a correct reading of the law. (Courts ultimately get to decide what's "impartial," as they do with all other laws that have definitions in them. That's how our system works.)

7:46 PM - 5 Jul 2021

8 Retweets
47 Likes

2 replies 8 retweets 47 likes

1. Chloé S. Valdary ‏Verified account @cvaldary Jul 5
  Replying to @realchrisrufo @thomaschattwill and
  
  I believe it can be reasonably argued that re Tennessee, Section 51 (a) is too broad in its language and fundamentally contradicts (b).
  
  6 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Orestes Augustus‏ @OrestesAugustus Jul 5
  Replying to @realchrisrufo @cvaldary and
  
  I wonder if some following this are beginning to understand why @ConceptualJames takes the approach he does.
  
  1 reply 1 like
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Tweets

Christopher F. Rufo

@realchrisrufo

Tweets

Loading seems to be taking a while.

false

Saved searches

Tweets

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

@realchrisrufo

Tweets

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

Promote this Tweet

Block

Tweet with a location

Your lists

Create a new list

Copy link to Tweet

Embed this Tweet

Embed this Video

Preview

Why you're seeing this ad

Log in to Twitter

Sign up for Twitter

Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

Confirmation

Welcome home!

Tweets not working for you?

Say a lot with a little

Spread the word

Join the conversation

Learn the latest

Get more of what you love

Find what's happening

Never miss a Moment

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Promoted Tweet

false

Christopher F. Rufo