You'll be surprised to hear this, but this New Yorker profile is an accurate, fair, and thoughtful account of my fight against critical race theory. My sense is that many center-left liberals are starting to turn on CRT.https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/how-a-conservative-activist-invented-the-conflict-over-critical-race-theory …
-
-
Two answers for the commenters: -Not sure why the artist gave me a chubby face! -I think "invented" is accurate in the sense that I framed the issue in a new way and did the investigative reporting that sparked much of this debate. I don't take it negatively.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
‘Invented’ is a weird synonym for initiated. It sounds silly but headlines matter more than content, and until that changes optics/signalling will always matter more than actual context.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Engage w/the other side? Yes. But my sense is you were disarmed by the author's personal charm and desensitized to the piece's interwoven bias. Briefly, I see an glaring asymmetry in how you &
@SandyLocks were described. (1/8) -
The piece tells us you "invent," (which connotes all this purely sprung from your head) what you saw as an "political opportunity," resulting in you fighting "cheerfully." In other words, you're presented as a figure of opportunism incarnate. (2/8)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.