Bap book is 3 years old. Douthat gets a big initial sale when the publisher dumps it on every bookstore and reviewer in the country. A year later…forgotten. BAP, 100% through word of mouth. Still selling. It’s not even close which one has more cultural impact
-
-
Replying to @L0m3z @realchrisrufo
Meh? 1000 copies/month means <40,000 copies over 3 years. So an order of magnitude less than a single Douthat column, and that’s before the reach of the tv appearances and podcasts. But show me the major politician or pundit adopting an innovative BAP insight, & I’ll buy a copy.
11 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
I agree with you, although it's interesting: I've seen a lot of discussion about the Bronze Age book over a long period of time, but very little after the initial reviews for a lot of the mainstream books.
2 replies 0 retweets 27 likes -
Same kind of reaction with Curtis Yarvin and Slate Star Codex: they have devoted niche followings, but they're not going on Tucker Carlson and reaching the masses.
7 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @realchrisrufo @L0m3z
Even relative to BAP, important people read Siskind and Sailer, and they get laundered into the conversation, though perhaps not as much as they should. But Douthat used to be a nobody blogger too. He got the platform because he was good.
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @tedfrank @realchrisrufo
Ross is a very good writer, but getting selected to be the respectable conservative at the NYTs is not a measure of how broadly resonant one’s ideas are. This is self-evident.
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @L0m3z @realchrisrufo
Again: you’re greatly overestimating BAP’s reach. He has a fraction of Ross’s Twitter following, and a fraction even of Chris’s. And both of the latter two are substantially less online and reliant on Twitter.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tedfrank @realchrisrufo
Im not over or under estimating it. I’m not estimating it all. I'm looking at the raw numbers of their respective book sales. That’s a measure of people willing to pay for their ideas. The rest is noise.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @L0m3z @realchrisrufo
I mean, I suscribe to the Times to get Douthat’s ideas. If he went full substack, he’d do at least half of Yglesias’s traffic and make more money than Chris or I make. Releasing a book in March 2020 that became instantly outdated after a short time on the bestseller list is fine.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Yes, I imagine Ross would get paid more via Substack than with the Times, but reach a far smaller audience on Substack than with the Times. It's a weird fragmentation of audience and economy.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
My own strategy is to try to marry the two: shoot for the WSJ op-eds and Fox News appearances that reach millions of people, while building a devoted paying audience for my direct content.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.