Yes, and it’s not even close. Bans on teaching “divisive concepts” (the phrase many of these laws use) runs counter to decades of First Amendment precedent. Moreover, dramatically limiting the First Amendment in higher ed wouldn’t work out the way the right likes.https://twitter.com/glukianoff/status/1398537340570718211 …
-
David, in our recent conversation, you said you supported the Idaho law, which relies on a compelled speech framework. And the old New Hampshire bill, which you criticized, has been rewritten to place its basis on compelled speech, following the Idaho law.
The objective here is to prevent public schools from indoctrinating children into a hateful, divisive, unfalsifiable ideology. If Idaho, NH, and other states are passing bills that will withstand legal challenge, I'd love to have your open, affirmative support for them.
-
-
Holy shit, I haven't seen this much gargabe in one place since the last trump rally.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.