My takeaway: @bariweiss is using her substack to host highly compelling discussions. Next time I’d love to hear the voice of an actual CRT advocate. @realchrisrufo is a highly skilled debater. By 60 minutes in, it’s over. When they get into legal questions, @DavidAFrench has won.https://twitter.com/thomaschattwill/status/1399072943288815618 …
-
I take his legal criticisms seriously, but by the end of the debate, David endorsed the Idaho bill. And his criticism of the New Hampshire bill is now moot—the bill has been revamped and focused on compelled speech, which, as with Idaho, I imagine David would now support.
The question isn't a legal-technical question, which David concedes can be overcome with a grounding on compelled speech, but whether states should prohibit public schools from promoting race essentialism, collective guilt, and racial superiority theory.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.