What a weird attempt at a gotcha from Hill. The fundamental critique of “whiteness,” from people like Rufo, isn’t so much that it “paints being white as negative,” but that it paints being white as anything at all. So of course that trap isn’t going to land.https://twitter.com/marclamonthill/status/1397522506198753280 …
-
2:20Show this thread -
Rufo sees “whiteness” as a category that affixes a value on members of a group based on their racial identity—which for Rufo is not a justifiable basis for evaluating people, whether positively or negatively.
1 reply 0 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
Rufo has me blocked. This isn’t a Support Your Pals thread. But advocates of racial identitarianism need a better understanding of what the critiques fundamentally are.
3 replies 0 retweets 52 likesShow this thread
Replying to @bernybelvedere
I've unblocked you. We will give it another try.
11:36 AM - 26 May 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.