You cannot be a genuine proponent of free expression and want to ban CRT.
-
-
You have a right to advocate as you do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
TCW citing Hitchens here is instructive, as Hitchens came out forcefully many times against "intelligent design" and "teaching the controversy" RE: Evolution. So clearly, even TCW's gold standard example would have advocated some limits on the same grounds you do
-
Right. Not even to mention Hitchens's contempt for postmodernism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m sorry, Chris, but it’s not just schools. The military is also compelling this into soldiers who cannot refuse it. It’s getting into corporations who can fire people for not attending these compulsory meetings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Elevating people who would suppress free expression is not “supporting free expression” and no one should be compelled to participate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is nothing libertarian about state-run anything. Wtf.
-
Disingenuous sleight-of-hand. He's maybe referring to Hayekian-type arguments for regulating *private* monopolies. "The most libertarian philosophies" are not taking a public monopoly for granted, though.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
In fact, the bans being proposed in school curricula are theoretically bans on STATE speech
-
We are SUPPOSED to be limiting STATE speech. Isn't that part of what the Civil Rights movement was about?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Under the most libertarian philosophies the state would not be running schools at all, let alone have a monopoly on education
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.