You cannot be a genuine proponent of free expression and want to ban CRT.
Show this thread
-
If the Klan sponsored a public school curriculum that promoted race essentialism, collective guilt, and racial superiority theory, I would support legislation to ban it from schools—while still granting them their right to express it as individual citizens.
The Supreme Court has ruled consistently that restrictions on curricular speech are not restrictions on free speech. In fact, it is the responsibility of state legislatures to craft a curriculum that reflects the values of their citizens. Nobody has the right to indoctrinate.
-
-
100% agree.
-
The past year’s pushed me more and more towards a free speech, marketplace of ideas absolutism. I’m against banning. I’m with Hitchens full stop: "Every time you violate or propose to violate the free speech of someone else, in potentia, you’re making a rod for your own back."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A law that prohibits public universities from hosting speakers is not a regulation of curricular speech. So at least Idaho's law is pure unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination. (curricular speech doctrine itself is far more complicated than you're suggesting too)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is true. SCOTUS has historically taken a softer 1A view with respect to schools.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.