Internecine split: @glukianoff & @TheFIREorg against the bills banning CRT, @realchrisrufo for them. They should debate. Or someone should. Beats echo chamber podcasts.https://twitter.com/glukianoff/status/1390564807703601153 …
-
I would love such a debate! I am hearing good arguments for and against and would love to hear how some knowledgeable people lay out the arguments and provide analysis.
-
-
I'd love to see this happen.
-
Me too. I'd have a critical eye for how queer theory inspired indoctrination of 4th graders is construed as "academic freedom".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
FIRE doesn’t litigate either. Just throwing that out there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I fully support FIRE, but they are mistaken here. Teaching *about* CRT in say, college (critiquing it) is one thing. ADVOCATING for CRT in college or K-12 is indoctrination. Would FIRE support teaching K-12 that, Blacks are the reasons the U.S. is chaotic and violent? No.
-
The article we are talking about is about *higher education*. The law applying to K-12 is different and that is explicitly not addressed in that article.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Would love to watch this debate. We need to assure that all these bills are not only litigation-proof but serve to bolster constitutional principles of both free speech and equal protection.
-
Agreed. We need debate on these topics: (1) what are the unintended consequences of the "divisive concepts" bill? (2) are there alternative approaches to the current bills? (3) Is the anti-1619 bill is too narrow? (4) should we have a Students' Bill of Rights?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.