The fact that a vague limp-wristed anti-essentialist view of reality had much in common with the fist-pumping essentialism of Marxism was a reach that a lot of people in the IDW were more to happy to make, and it was their first big error.https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1389255521325109250 …
-
2/ The two were thought to be philosophically compatible and complimentary. This never made sense to me (and to lots of other people). An article in Aero (probably around 2018) successfully attacked it, and after that fewer people advanced the idea, thank goodness.
Which camp are you in? What do you think is the most important lineage?
-
-
I think both inform the scholarship in some of the grievance studies departments, for example. But they're *separate* influences, and academics take what they want from *each* of them. PoMo and Marx are not easily hybridized into a single philosophical framework.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.