So if the Christian baker had refused to bake a cake for a gay couple—not because they were gay, but because they were *unvaccinated*—conservatives would really switch sides on this one?
-
I’m sorry that principles bore you!
No, it's that your factual premise is wrong (the baker didn't deny service because the couple was gay) and your conclusion is nonsensical (conservatives oppose compelled speech *and* mandatory vaccine passports, but not for the same reason/constitutional principle).
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.