Chris, this really reads as disingenuous. Some of them are seditious and literally just beat a police officer to death. Come on now.
-
-
-
The language of many of the BLM protests was explicitly to overthrow the United States government—literally revolution through violence resistance. And yet, somehow, the media never labeled them "seditionists" and tried to shut down their institutions. Quite the opposite!
2 replies 6 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @realchrisrufo @drdina1
That “the media” failed in their responsibility to label things correctly doesn’t give you a pass to do the same.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
This increasingly reads like “the media were inaccurate hypocrites so we get to be the same.” No, no you don’t.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
What am I labeling incorrectly?
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @realchrisrufo @drdina1
We have substantial evidence that folks used violence (again, a police officer was murdered) and the language of revolution last week but you keep engaging in the same denial tactics that people who defended BLM did last summer. You are doing exactly why the media did last summer
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
My argument is pretty simple and consistent: neither the Capitol rioters nor the BLM rioters were actually instigating a coup. They were both engaging in reprehensible political violence—which I condemned—but their "coups" were merely theatrical, postmodern, symbolic.
4 replies 1 retweet 21 likes -
Replying to @realchrisrufo @drdina1
Chaz was not performative; the destruction of businesses was not performative; the shooting of David Dorn was not performative.
1 reply 3 retweets 16 likes -
If you’re arguing that their use of reprehensible violence was mere play acting and they weren’t seriously trying to overthrow anything, I don’t know what to say.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
-
-
-
They did this to stop the certification of electoral votes, Chris. It was an attempted coup.
19 replies 0 retweets 10 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.