So you support the spreading of lies, or should access be restricted when the information being shared is false? And it should be up to the user to determine what is truth?
The internet, social media, and digital payments are the roads, telephones, and marketplace of the 21st century. The tech monopolies should not have the power to unilaterally ban people from the new public square. Free markets require open access. This is the fight.
-
-
-
Certainly not. I support only approved truth, and users should think exactly what they're told to think. After all, if our corporate masters approve of it, it cannot be false. Praise capitalism!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We’re an oligarchy now it seems. They probably run the country. Our votes are mostly just for show.
-
1. When this President leaves, our government to go back to boring and run of the mill. 2. Twitter doesn’t run the country 3. Our votes were all counted and people who were voted for are being put into their places.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Waiting for a modern day "Prunyard" decision (1970s private malls considered modern day town square CA Const free speech applies) to arrive. If rhat happens in CA the country follows. Cases were in CA Supreme Ct and SCOTUS.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center_v._Robins …
-
Interesting, thanks for the link.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Unleash(and enforce)the antitrust laws please.
-
Plenty of online options for the hateful right to spew forth their hate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nailed it. Once you have you bound and gagged, the restraints won't be removed by discourse.
-
They blocked a sitting President for inciting violence and death. Pretty reasonable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.