The Seattle City Council will consider legislation to provide blanket immunity to misdemeanor crimes to any person who suffers from poverty, homelessness, addiction, or mental illness.
Here's how the legislation would work. 
-
Show this thread
-
As a pretext, the councilmembers claim that "income inequality," "local law enforcement's killing of Black, Indigenous, and people of color," and "poverty, institutional racism, and systemic oppression" are the root causes of crime.pic.twitter.com/kbHLhaoNVc
23 replies 46 retweets 261 likesShow this thread -
The legislation would exempt anyone with an addiction or mental health disorder from a wide range of crimes, including theft, assault, harassment, drug possession, property destruction, and indecent exposure.pic.twitter.com/AJwdcpAi0V
37 replies 59 retweets 301 likesShow this thread -
The results would be disastrous. In 2019, the Seattle Police Department reported 50,609 thefts, assaults, property offenses, frauds, trespasses, and narcotic violations. If the ordinance passes, nearly all of these crimes could be permitted under law.
20 replies 54 retweets 405 likesShow this thread -
Here's my full analysis for City Journal.https://www.city-journal.org/seattle-policymakers-untouchables-misdemeanor-crime …
30 replies 86 retweets 362 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @realchrisrufo
1/Competing and serious issues. City living people need to feel like they can walk down the street in safety. Businesses need to be able to operate without endless problems
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StefanKertesz @realchrisrufo
2/People fall out of housing market often because of substantial life problems or “a few bad strokes + no money”. Either way, their deterioration is often not well managed by law enforcement, whose primary power (state sanctioned force) is poorly suited to the situation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StefanKertesz @realchrisrufo
3/Usually the step that makes the splash for journalists (in this case a possible ordinance) is neither the beginning nor end of more serious work that happens among multiple community agents and advocates who have more shared concerns than the headline you offer would suggest
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StefanKertesz @realchrisrufo
4/I would not assume we (certainly not me) know either the full story or the actual good steps that people will try to make even if this particular ordinance is rejected as I would imagine it will be
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's an ideological project, not a practical governance project. I think there's a great argument for diversion/treatment for people with serious issues (I have cited your papers!), but this council has consistently rejected paths to treatment as a solution.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.