You know it will. And it'll be less costly to stand up.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Related question: will it be ADA- and screen-reader-compliant?
Frankly, who cares? It's a pandemic and the website needs to be built as quickly as possible for the largest majority of users. We can all pitch in by helping translate for any disabled friends and family that have trouble with it.
-
-
But that wasn't your question. Your question was: will it work better than the ACA website. And the ACA website was designed (had to be) to be ADA- and screen-reader-compliant. I don't dispute the point you've just made that we should stand this up fast because emergency, but...
-
Genuinely curious: given the same time, budget, and specs for an ACA-style website, do you think the engineers at Google would perform better, worse, or the same as the engineers at HHS?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If v1 isn't for some reason, I doubt it'll take 3 years to bring it up to those standards.
-
And that's a very fair point.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.