I'm posting this now, despite my fear that it will take even more work away from me. #AB5 is destroying #freelancer jobs. @LorenaSGonzalez, you say this puts the onus on businesses, but you're taking my jobs away. LISTEN TO US!https://www.damemagazine.com/2019/10/22/will-this-california-law-end-freelance-work/?fbclid=IwAR3eBULYwtH3XaLRScOme0b-OE1vEb8f6bwX6GivtOW0lKipO1E4yKtu4Dw …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JulianaOnBeat @JennaBusch
Perhaps a note that the Supreme Court made a rule for all workers. We didn’t lump people in... we used Dynamex which affected everyone to start from.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LorenaSGonzalez @JennaBusch
Wondered this: “Given media’s current state of crisis—unlike flourishing ride-sharing industry—it’s hard to imagine why authors of AB 5 decided to lump together…truck drivers, translators, photographers, musicians—when the real goal was to regulate Uber and Lyft.”
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JulianaOnBeat @JennaBusch
The author never asked me what the intent was. The intent was to codify a sweeping Supreme Court decision and tackle misclassification in every industry. Dynamex has applied to everyone since 4/2018... we loosened the restrictions for some in AB5
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The goal was always big structural change... I have said that over and over, but reporters assumed it was Uber and Lyft. misclassification pre-dates app hiring.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Sometimes "big structural change" doesn't work out as planned.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.