Last week, Seattle and King County leaders hired transgender stripper Beyoncé Black St. James to perform at their annual conference on solving homelessness. Here's how they're using taxpayer money:pic.twitter.com/J0lCKVVfgO
Show this thread
Agreed. I have zero problem with people hiring transgender strippers on their own time and dime. But when it's taxpayer money that's supposed to help the homeless, that's a problem.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
So why did you say transgender stripper and not just stripper or better yet just call it entertainment paid by the tax payer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do hope you call out the entertainment at every conference; but somehow I doubt it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The fact that you feel the need to keep (mis)informing us that the performer is a "transgender stripper" says, pretty loudly, what you're actually taking issue with, here. lol ...and what, exactly, is this supposed mean?https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1206046226526793728 …
-
The issue is why are they using tax money to pay for a stripper. At a conference about using tax money for the homeless.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don’t care if she’s transgendered, he’s transgendered ( I don’t know which way who was transitioning to get the politically correct speak correct) gay, straight, or Episcopalian. This is NSFW and shouldn’t be a government event.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.