here's a clip taken from youtube of steven crowder, who @TeamYouTube have said does not violate their policies. youtube are apparently happy to have this material on their websitepic.twitter.com/NsIDtHAwCE
-
-
But saying "harassment isn't allowed" is meaningless if you can't address the semantics of what constitutes harassment. Think of it as saying "qweghoubqerg isn't allowed".
-
I mean I think the extent of whether something is considered harassment is up to YouTube decide. But obviously there should be justification for why it isn’t allowed, and given that YouTube is a site accessible by children, it makes sense
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.