Then "they" have the wrong expectations. The original document that describes Mimblewimble can be found here: https://scalingbitcoin.org/papers/mimblewimble.txt … The word anonymity is not mentioned therein.
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
- Još 3 druga odgovora
-
-
-
https://twitter.com/vcorem/status/1196445021664403457 … and https://twitter.com/hashmap/status/1196460575351541763 …. This article analyzed Grin but call it "Mimblewimble". Grin != Mimblewimble.
-
Indeed. And it does not help at all that Grin is hosted on a GitHub account called "mimblewimble". https://twitter.com/BrianAgrees/status/1196484942445850631 …
Tweet je nedostupan.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The claimed privacy model is indeed very narrow and I applaud the Grin devs for writing one up (see https://github.com/mimblewimble/docs/wiki/Grin-Privacy-Primer …). However, many many people believed it did actually provide privacy.
-
I agree with you both here.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You seem to use the term "anonymity" for the fact that the *transaction graph* is obfuscated? Is that the case? (I'm surprised you use such a broad term for something so specific).
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thank you
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.