If one can intervene in the flows enough to dampen their cyberpositive propulsion without falling into the circuit that actually reinforces it, then it needs to be demonstrated instead of declared
-
I know how nuanced your position is Ed. Do all your brethren share your mutationist stance? Does u/acc as a set of thematic operators support the notion that some patchworks might include agents of sapience continuity in some human recognizable form? I doubt it.
promethean modernity, sounds like great fuel for the conflagration
-
-
To recreate the “human security system” in miniature, non-confederated form? I dunno. Is it? My/our patchwork might be different than yours/theirs?
-
They will all be different. That's the point. Experimentation.
-
I would like to think that’s the point. But where does extinction fit in to this eclectic bunch of meso-intervening system of human securities scene?
-
That's impossible to say. The "singularity" point of acceleration is a wall we can't see beyond, the dense crunch of time compression. This is an eschatology without an eschaton
-
I suggest alternative eschatologies; even some non-eschatological trajectories. Some seriously weird sideways shit. Must prompt is to stay open to conditioning the conditions of that process.
-
lol we're just gonna go into circles at this point
-
Yeah, too abstract. Like I said: details.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.