Again, if that meme-complex is not about unconditioning, the unconditional, etc, (even without naming it constantly) the its about nothing, really. “Letting go” of the conditions of U/acc means it’s just base accelerationism. Which, in that case, is complicitness with anon forces
-
-
Yeah. That is precisely the question. Can clustered agencies affect the circuits enough to sway broader tendencies? I say yes. Y’all say “nay, let that shit go man.” That to me is thanatological path. Prometheus at least had guts.
-
promethean modernity, sounds like great fuel for the conflagration -
Ha! What about promethean mutationism (with continuity)? Which is where I’m at. Fuck modernity. Was a temp stop long on much creepier journey.
-
tbh the creepy journey of promethean mutationism is exactly how I would describe modernity/the accelerative process!
-
Take the Area X story for example. One crack in reality, one external glitch in the smooth systems of modernity, or one agental force from the Outside changed/mutated the whole trajectory of human history. That’s whole point of being ontologically exposed to/within the Outside.
-
What you're describing here is *exactly* how I understand the process. Also I'm noting the irony of invoking a mutational extinction story...
-
I know how nuanced your position is Ed. Do all your brethren share your mutationist stance? Does u/acc as a set of thematic operators support the notion that some patchworks might include agents of sapience continuity in some human recognizable form? I doubt it.
-
Isn't that the whole point of patchwork?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.