Besides, he's too busy showing he never had undergraduate ethics classes to bother showing he never had undergrad statistics classes.
So you don't read Land because he's boring? Or because he's an asshole? Or is it the combination of the two? And you achieved that insight without reading him?
-
-
Where did you get the indication that I haven't read him?
-
If you're going to do the REDDIT LOGIC MASTER line of questioning, you might not want to presume things based on an imaginary opponent in your head.
-
Land is many things but he isn't boring. You can call my assumptions a heuristic if it makes you feel better.
-
Yeah, he's boring. Hence the obfuscated contrarianism comment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.