Right, because blacks are such low risks for mortgages. And they’re such nice neighbors. Nowhere on earth can blacks even begin to compete with whites or Asians in a free market. You lay a large premium to live *away* from them.
-
It worked right up until it ceased to be implemented. It didn’t break.
-
-
It isn’t that it became impossible or unsustainable. It’s that South Africans and muh international community decided to end it, and they’ve paid for it ever since.
-
What I’ve heard is that apartheid itself is the cause, not the defense against, black violence, and that the exclusion of blacks from the land market specifically is the cause. As if Bantus have the innate IQ to compete with white settlers in a free market!
-
why legally exclude them then?
-
Because they’re naturally prone to violence and criminality.
-
And rape. They’re way into rape.
-
we must make legal things illegal for these people so they don't do illegal things with them! ban assault farms! t. right-winger
-
If you want to see brutal apartheid, unleash anarcho-capitalism on South Africa. Private security would be tossing hecatombs of aggressive blacks into burning pits for months.
-
DeBeers = evil, racial aristocracy is bad mmkay Selling land to super-competitive neurologically uniform blacks = coldness be muh god
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.