Max Castle

So it remains a possibility that capitalism could be derailed, but it cannot be permanently channeled for any activity that runs counter to it's logic. This is why, in my more uncharitable moments, I assert that there is no real difference between r & l acc.

They both assert a more fundamental level where one could stand and direct the malstrom for some 'higher' purpose. I don't think there is much evidence that this is possible (or should even be desired).

The notion of escape velocity arguably presupposes a point prior to which the whole thing is still vulnerable to terrestrial forces... R/acc takes this threat seriously and refuses to just handwave it away. It's not about harnessing /acc to bring back the Renaissance or Rome.

R/acc (as a genus/cohort) see U/acc (as a genus/cohort) as L/acc because residual Progressivism is spliced into its DNA. The conflict is therefore intersectional and supra-ideological, relative to /acc's core principals of Capital Intelligence Escalation.

How does one determine that has been sufficiently purified of "progressivism"? It would seem that some r/acc members had once been 'spliced' good and hard by progressivism.

From my spliced dna perspective, this is a problem with maintaining "no one to your right". Everyone looks to be a leftist. u/acc wants to get past this sort of thinking, as limiting.

It's not about pointlessly signalling "righter than though" BS. It's about accepting and imbibing core NRx political analysis in order to better understand the instantiation of contemporary Power dynamics i.e. the techonomic bio-playing field.

NRX political analysis as in "USG is poorly formalized sovereign corporation" or as in "those lefties are really evil doods destroying hoomanity"? you never know these days.