more like, if they want it so bad, why aren't they trying harder?
-
-
-
Replying to @meta_nomad @adornofthagn and
as a transitive verb, yes, sometimes.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @adornofthagn and
As a..._trans_itive verb...I'll see myself out.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @meta_nomad and
but really, can we agree that the only contention between u/acc and r/acc is the importance of trans* stuff to the basic dynamics of acceleration?
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @meta_nomad and
Think you are confusing an effect for the cause.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @meta_nomad and
r/acc has a problem with 'trans' because they have not sufficiently emptied themselves of the remnants that tie them to the world presently constituted. This is the "r" in r/acc. There are other features of their ideology that would equally be considered a drag.
5 replies 3 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @cyborg_nomade and
So it *is* a matter of personal preference. You see the remnants as regressive, we see the remnants - whatever they may be - as an OS restore point.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
It's a theory. Some may have a preference for it and some may not. The point is that it doesn't matter whether you have a preference for it. The future will see if the theory, at least in it's negative formulation, is correct.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.