Max Castle

Which imo brings it around to the deeper idea of praxis, not as a plan of political action, but as a revolutionary act of self consciousness which amounts to the processes own realization

I don't think there is any disagreement over the subsumption of the sense of freedom invoked here into the process -- after all that sense of freedom is a recognition of the inability to free oneself from the process. Not sure why that would amount to the realization of the..

process though... as per the utilization of certain agent's ideas/actions to further the process, absolutely! The sticky question is whether or not the ideas or actions have the degree of autonomy that a linear read would suggest, or whether or not we're dealing with more..

nonlinear entanglements. U/acc stakes out the latter, which is why the process has been defined in terms of a complex 'metasystem' before.

This is all fair enough, and this is where i do disagree, what the process is ‘realizing’ is nothing less than the condition of autonomy, as understood as a general regulatory persoective through which agents mitigate their own actions wrt to one another

This is not something far in the future thay doesnt exist realizing itself autonomously, its a transcendental condition of autonomy which lies at the bottom of the whole process

Hmm I think we'll probably find ourselves in an unproductive accelerationist chicken-and-egg problem, but insofar that you're posing here a process that 1) enfolds agential activity and 2) regulates agential activity (correct me if I'm wrong), the disagreements are not terribly..

The chicken and the egg part is precisely the classic problem imo, i agree with l and r being identical and necessitating synthesis, but is u/acc that synthesis, can it be, if it does not hold both views simultaneously as one?