In the Theory of Acceleration lectures, Land actually hesitates to embrace the idea that he is r/acc, arguing that 'right accelerationism' doesn't properly exist and emerges reflexively as a phrase only because left-accelerationism is invented.
-
-
Replying to @Moctezuma_III @parallaxoptics and
He goes on to express disbelief at what a right-accelerationist project would actually entail, and that he'd prefer accelerationism without political pre-conditions. As far as I know, it was from that discussion that the term 'unconditional acceleration' emerged.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @Moctezuma_III @parallaxoptics and
So my suspicion of u/acc has generally been opposite of
@parallaxoptics (that the u/acc crowd are crypto-cathedralists), I've been concerned that the u/acc crowd are all Landian crypto-racists.4 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @Moctezuma_III @parallaxoptics and
is it still a suspicion?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @parallaxoptics and
The topic of race is largely missing from the u/acc blogosphere, that's bound to draw suspicion from both the left and right. But really, a philosopher's power to carry out genocide or achieve utopian multiculturalism are so slim... what does it matter?
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @anon_1086 @cyborg_nomade and
This 'hard' unconditionality is totally Land's sense of 'acceleration without preconditions'. Are the u/acc crowd actually this hard?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Moctezuma_III @cyborg_nomade and
Doubtful. Not post-op, anyway.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Kinda obsessed with it actually. It's weird, really.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.