Not in the actual essay
-
I have so far, I'm just getting suspicious of the relentless misreading of the whole thing.
A good start would be to stop attributing petty motivations to a theory. But that seems to be the whole tamale.
-
-
This is like complaining that any critique of Lenninism’s false party democracy is an ad hom, it can seem like that, but on the other hand it is part of Lenninism philosophically
-
The problem is that the "they are all just academics in Cathedral army" is just bullshit and rests largely on Vince's position. It would be roughly equivalent if my only criticism of r/acc was that it was generated by minds the art world told to fuck off...
-
R/acc was generated by the mind of
@Outsideness before you "guys" cucked it and submitted it to genital mutilation... -
Exorbitant demands for social self-sacrifice are probably counter-productive. ...
-
... U/Acc certainly exhibits (cunning) survival instincts. That doesn't strike me as an obvious basis for derision.
-
It's the latent Progressivism underpinning those instincts I was seeking to draw attention to. But your point stands.
-
Complete excision of such a mind worm is a tricky procedure even for a top surgeon
-
Of course, this is why I was looking for its attenuation. But again, fair point.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"while at the same time salvaging Accelerationism from dubious associations its picked up with unsavory Neoreactionary characters (Right Accelerationism (R/ACC)) that might tarnish its professional legitimacy & viability as an academy-friendly interest within theory departments"
-
that's overtly false, to begin with.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.