-
-
Replying to @EBBerger
Have you read Marinetti? Wyndham Lewis? Anything fascist at all? It's not all badly done clod hopping, you know. And yes, a lot of it is quite similar
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But clearly the passage about workers enjoying their exploitation is the one in question. That's obvious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scsquibb
In what way does that constitute fascism? Are similar points made about the beneficial side of capitalism in Marx also tainted with a fascistic sheen?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EBBerger
But those tendencies do not approach something that can be justifiably be called fascist, not least because fascism is a 20thC phenomenon
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So the argument is that libidinal economy is not fascist because it's aristocratic like Marx?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scsquibb
No. The argument is that it's not fascist because it's devoid of fascist content.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger
Like what would it have to say for you to think it is fascist?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Maybe commentary on how to bundle sticks?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @EBBerger
That's it exactly, Max. Y'all don't think fascism exists. At least your boy Land grapples with it constantly, in his own limited a-historical way
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It doesn't follow that if we deny fascism is Lyotard we therefore deny fascism in general. That is a problem with logic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.