It's called an editorial process, look it uphttps://twitter.com/realMaxCastle/status/931491562558775296 …
-
The joke continues. So you don't think Land's essay is 'worthwhile/useful'? Or are you just afraid to say that one set of thoughts (political) don't invalidate another. You decide to do this every time you publish authors on Heideggerian, Blanchot, Levinas etc.
It's just Land where you make this decision. And it makes you look childish and unworthy of consideration.
-
-
I can assure you there are many other authors we choose not to publish too.
-
Quick inquiry: Is it Repeater policy to commission a piece from, then proceed to post an introduction online which references to that piece AFTER you've decided to exclude it on the basis of some hand-wringing purity test? Asking for a friend.
-
Aww did the delicate baby fascist get his bullshit bottle taken away by a mean ol' indie publisher?
-
Look if you don't know what a word means don't use it. It just makes you look like an idiot.
-
How refreshingly profound
-
Just so I understand: in your world, folks who don't think people should be protected from controversial ideas are the babies and those who need protection are the heroes? Interesting.
-
Jesus man turn on any Murdoch station anywhere, it's all Nick Land all the time. Nothing could be less controversial or more hopelessly mainstream than aging anglophone technofuturist racism. You're a baby for pretending otherwise
-
Again if you think that then you are more delusional than I had imagined. Ofc, even if true, Land's essay is not about politics but on psychoanalysis. They are protecting people from the mere proximity to an idea. Embarrassing.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.