It's called an editorial process, look it uphttps://twitter.com/realMaxCastle/status/931491562558775296 …
-
We want to promote marginalised ideas that we think worthwhile/useful. To publish work solely because it's marginalised would be ridiculous. & being 'edgy' is not the same as being radical.
The joke continues. So you don't think Land's essay is 'worthwhile/useful'? Or are you just afraid to say that one set of thoughts (political) don't invalidate another. You decide to do this every time you publish authors on Heideggerian, Blanchot, Levinas etc.
-
-
It's just Land where you make this decision. And it makes you look childish and unworthy of consideration.
-
I can assure you there are many other authors we choose not to publish too.
-
Quick inquiry: Is it Repeater policy to commission a piece from, then proceed to post an introduction online which references to that piece AFTER you've decided to exclude it on the basis of some hand-wringing purity test? Asking for a friend.
-
Aww did the delicate baby fascist get his bullshit bottle taken away by a mean ol' indie publisher?
-
Look if you don't know what a word means don't use it. It just makes you look like an idiot.
-
How refreshingly profound
-
Just so I understand: in your world, folks who don't think people should be protected from controversial ideas are the babies and those who need protection are the heroes? Interesting.
-
Jesus man turn on any Murdoch station anywhere, it's all Nick Land all the time. Nothing could be less controversial or more hopelessly mainstream than aging anglophone technofuturist racism. You're a baby for pretending otherwise
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.