I think you nailed it. The Harman is only included to get that sweet, sweet OOP cash. It is a remarkably basic essay explaining Freud & D+G with a paragraph on OOP attached. Completely without merit.
Ye ol' @RepeaterBooks has Harman's contribution the 'Neurotic Turn.' It is as boring and basic as you should expect. Harman of course makes it all about himself. #makeobjectsasnarcissisticasHarmanispic.twitter.com/l6CkkfwONN
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I've only read the Harman. Looking forward to the Kolozova but that's about it. Noys is the o ly other author who I have read things from but he can't be taken seriously.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
True but he is also intellectually lazy and dedicated follower of anything that has the hint of cool.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
The Americans point is a good one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.