Max Castle

We want to promote marginalised ideas that we think worthwhile/useful. To publish work solely because it's marginalised would be ridiculous. & being 'edgy' is not the same as being radical.

The joke continues. So you don't think Land's essay is 'worthwhile/useful'? Or are you just afraid to say that one set of thoughts (political) don't invalidate another. You decide to do this every time you publish authors on Heideggerian, Blanchot, Levinas etc.

It's just Land where you make this decision. And it makes you look childish and unworthy of consideration.

I can assure you there are many other authors we choose not to publish too.

Quick inquiry: Is it Repeater policy to commission a piece from, then proceed to post an introduction online which references to that piece AFTER you've decided to exclude it on the basis of some hand-wringing purity test? Asking for a friend.

Aww did the delicate baby fascist get his bullshit bottle taken away by a mean ol' indie publisher?

Look if you don't know what a word means don't use it. It just makes you look like an idiot.

How refreshingly profound