whether in everyday contexts or operational ones. Philosophical meaning talk, whereby philosophers attempt to use intentional cognition...
-
-
Replying to @TheDevilsChirp @cyborg_nomade
…in *every* attempt to explain anything.
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @deontologistics @cyborg_nomade
some kind of exceptional deep information environment, be transcendental, phenomenological, logical, or what have you.
11 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TheDevilsChirp @cyborg_nomade
But the further away you move from perception the more *aboutness* talk starts to look like a constitutive feature of cognition.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @deontologistics @cyborg_nomade
tool sets strike us as spooky constraints simply because they are the only thing visible when we attempt to source our cognitive capacities.
8 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheDevilsChirp @cyborg_nomade
In this case, operating at a higher level of functional abstraction is a virtuous filtering of irrelevant information, not neglect.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @deontologistics @cyborg_nomade
And how do you know it's virtuous? How do you know you're not neglecting crucial information? Abstraction is problematic precisely ...
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @deontologistics @cyborg_nomade
I just think there's more efficacious ways of accomplishing what we want to accomplish with abstraction talk.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheDevilsChirp
BTW, we should probably drop
@cyborg_nomade and @stlittlefield from the conversation. They can no doubt follow without being tagged.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't mind. Better than sport. Germany/Chile doesnt start for a bit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.