-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
I anticipated that was what you meant and I've objected to it before. it's a common thought, but wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bitemyapp
There is the looming problem here of how price formation occurs in the first place - and the basic impossibility of obtaining and inputting
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EBBerger @bitemyapp
the information that leads to that iterative process. The system would require the removal of the human from any point in the equation.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @bitemyapp
not only the human produces information. human desires are a way to adjust between competing productive endeavors (it wants to breath)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
as I pointed in the link elsewhere in this thread: time is always already running out, that's why things are scarce...
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
...if super AI solves *that* problem, then I concede communist realism.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @bitemyapp
Assuming a scenario in which the human element is gone and it's just super AI existing in that space prior to the heat death, the burden of
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
scarcity is great alleviated. This ofc is a very loose and contestable definition for communism, but if we take late Marx's position of
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
communism as emerging from capital working itself out through the process of modernity, I think we can do it.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Sometimes you just make a joke about hating Tankies and folks get all theoretical.
-
-
tfw u accidentally re-open the economic calculation debate
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @bitemyapp
that's never an accident because that's pretty much the *only* debate
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.