Max Castle

tbh hard disagree here. what ive read on his accelerationism is like, shit-tier misaplied french critical theory w/ only stylistic value

You should probably read more.

ok bud but he has no good concept/acknowledgement of rupture potentialities which pretty much turns me off immediately

and form of accelerationism is going to be opposed to rupture, but needs to acknowledge the possibility/reality of it, esp when pulling d&g

The word "rupture" stinks of "events" and I've had enough of the evental fallacy. Exhaustion is the only thing we need a theory of.

@jejesjesijessi do you remember when i thought this kind of shit was cool like this is just rebranded defeatism and is frankly stupid

if you think there is substantive difference, please explain, however this comes down to redressing old, unhelpful ideas in new language

The idea of "rupture (the event) functions as if history doesn't exist. Decisions have been made. Potentialities have been exhausted.