he said 'what important is the thought' which is a thought for thoughts sake argument.
-
-
Replying to @sz_duras @futuremurder and
Everything depends on nature of the thought. Some thoughts are stupid. Some may be dangerous but that doesn't mean we hide them or from them
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @futuremurder and
As you are now defending racist thought, and by implication race science... absolutely not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @realMaxCastle @futuremurder and
A supporter of racist texts and science being freely available does not get to say "book burning"
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
"book burning" try and stop me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @sz_duras and
the Soviets couldn't do it. the Fascists couldn't do it. the freaking NSA couldn't do it. you think antifa can?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @EchoExit_ @cyborg_nomade and
They will just make it incredibly painful to discuss anything anywhere that doesn't pass their purity test.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @cyborg_nomade and
As you inevitably support the distribution and perhaps teaching of racist history and science, you are going to pass the purity test
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The jokes continue. But of course they are meant to distract from the absence of a real discourse. Again, who passes your test?
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Replying to @EchoExit_ @sz_duras and
We are all cryptofascists. It's possible SZ is building an enormous suicide machine, fueled by guilt, aiming at total participation.
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.