anyway, I guess the main point has already been granted: freeing the slaves was perfectly compatible with secession.
-
-
serious ?s: 1. do you believe in the existence of facts, and, if so, do they matter for your ideas? 2. why don't racist orgs bother you?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scsquibb @cyborg_nomade and
Regardless of presence/absence of racism, what's important is the thought. Full stop.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @scsquibb and
the thought for thoughts sake is not terribly useful in our world, how to judge it on the other hand
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's not thought for thought sake. It's any insight that can help. Any port in a storm should be the rule.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
he said 'what important is the thought' which is a thought for thoughts sake argument.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sz_duras @futuremurder and
Everything depends on nature of the thought. Some thoughts are stupid. Some may be dangerous but that doesn't mean we hide them or from them
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @futuremurder and
As you are now defending racist thought, and by implication race science... absolutely not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @realMaxCastle @futuremurder and
A supporter of racist texts and science being freely available does not get to say "book burning"
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Is there a difference between burning and banning? Other than effeciency.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.