No reason to give a point by point rebuttal of such a poorly thought out critique, but let me point to one thing that is indicative of the whole. Look at the critique of 'determinism' in u/acc. (1/9)https://twitter.com/nihilaxis/status/1041856136364797953 …
-
Show this thread
-
There is a very basic confusion of the level where determinism is in u/acc. But let's assume that her critique is actually connecting to something. Here is her couple de gras (2/9):pic.twitter.com/iEgJUMtucf
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
To be plain, this is an intro to philosophy critique of determinism. But again, benefit of the doubt, right? Here is a question, if we determined (at the level that the author is critique) how could we decide NOT to write a blog? (3/9)
4 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @realMaxCastle
i don’t think that passage you quote was a critique of determination, but rather a critique of the hypocrisy involved in u/Acc’s praxis of anti-praxis. actually ‘letting go’ would entail a kind of quietism, no?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nihilaxis @realMaxCastle
and i do think you are mistaking her snark and polemics for the arguments made. i dunno. still waiting for someone to take down the takedown. have seen nothing by way of actual rebuttal yet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There is nothing to rebut. She provides a series of terrible readings. If it's all snark and polemics what is to refute?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.