No reason to give a point by point rebuttal of such a poorly thought out critique, but let me point to one thing that is indicative of the whole. Look at the critique of 'determinism' in u/acc. (1/9)https://twitter.com/nihilaxis/status/1041856136364797953 …
-
-
I will grant one point. Left accelerationism is not accelerationism. (9/9)
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, this is something that stuck out for me as well - to look at the present moment and posit "development is slowing down" is an unworkably simplified take on a complex and multifaceted issue. Tech development *can* slow down and does, but it's not obvious that this is...
-
If you get the claim that capital functions via work around then the slowdown claim is meaningless on its face.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The article latches on to Land as an authority, who gives a shit what Land said about hippies or transgression at this point. Land has always been a vehicle, a hyperstitional conduit. There is no "real" Nick Land, there is Vauung, Outsideness, Admin, professor Barker etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.