How do you know if a Twitter account is run by a humanities graduate? They talk about the wonders of 'epigenetics'.
-
Can I do both? Saying epigenetics is bunk is a step too far but it has clearly been latched onto by those who want to dismiss the 'determinism' of genetics. It started with Deleuzian vitalists about 15 years ago and looks like it has nowade it to the pseudo-commies. 1/2
The bigger problem is the question of epigenetics is simply irrelevant. Even if environmental factors were a larger causal agent in development, it would not then follow that "we could have some control over the way genetic traits are expressed."
-
-
"Even if the environment in which humans develop were a large causal factor in how they develop, this wouldn't imply humans could...manipulate the environment to affect development"? I hate playing "who's more obvi taking an instrumental position and phoning in the details?" but.
-
Yeah, you're right.
-
I imbued the author with a greater level of control than is necessary from her position here. One doesn't need the voodoo of epigenetics to recognize the possibility of something like genre manipulation. But this is a secondary and largely unrelated point.
@nihilaxis -
dismissing the concept and whole bodies of work on epigenetics as voodoo is a weak imo. can’t be explained away that easy. you leave yourself open to argumentative exploit with that
-
I could have said 'epigenetics'. I have already stated that it's a step too far to call it bunk. Epigenetic effect seems to be minor and not really a nail to hang your revoltionary hat on. And like many other such concepts that the humanists grab onto, it's going to disappoint.
-
i guess the empirical research on this determine if that’s true, or not. I just know that in a lot of anthropology circles gene-determinism is ridiculed in the same vein as Victorian science concepts
-
Don't think it's a ridiculed in the actual sciences that study the brain. But it would be remarkably bad for anthropology to become self-aware. It is not surprising at all for a humanities field to be opposed to the actual findings of sciences (I say this as a philosophy grad).
-
this smacks of scientism
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
sure it does. if ecology factors into how genes r expressed phenotypically, then designing our ecologies a certain way (to produce socially determined goals) is a form of guiding developmental outcomes. sentient meat is much more complex than any existing determinisms acknowledge
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.