"us"?
-
At least we got somewhere. The split is the age old question of humans having authority over their reality, free will. Henlo academy!
-
-
So in short, from uacc human action is tied to capital a priori?
-
I would say that humans have consistently over-estimated their level of conscious control. Almost to the point where we can formulate a definition of the human from this characteristic. "Human is the animal that believes itself to have a will"
-
The main argument, I guess in relation to capital. And it's not much of an argument, is that 'thus far' we've had -at least- a semblance of agency greater than other animals, which is ripe for questioning out motive in the universe.
-
I do think that capital can be derailed. But such an action, far from being emancipatory, would be catastrophic at the level of extinction.
-
You think capital can be derailed, ok, agreed. What, in your opinion, are the ways in which it can be derailed?
-
if it can be derailed (I'm not nearly as convinced of this as Max seems to be), it sure as hell can't be derailed by some apes doing some apeshit
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whilst it's fresh again. I'm not saying long term humans have agency over capital. However, for a short time 200000BC - now capital utilized humans as a means for its own future. The question is of free will in that time period which could fuck up capital's aims...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.