this insists calculation has to be cognitively tractable. isn't Gödel's incompleteness theorem exactly about how numbers exceed logical tractability?
-
-
the interest in Girard is mainly due to certain philosophical and methodological similarities (IMO) with Land's stuff.
-
It may or may not be more profitable to read Schmitt, much of what he says about liberalism is similar to this. In mathematics we had Hilbertism with its optimistic ambitions (wrecked by Godel), in politics some other analogous things.
-
Personally, I like this short read: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/43281/952-5092-90-9.pdf … Specially Chapter 2. (Schmitt fails to realize though how much the liberal ideal of neutrality is just a logical mirror-image of the illiberal ideal of papal infallibility)
-
Neutrality is the point and I don't think any of the u/acc people have ever claimed to be neutral.
-
*neutrality IS NOT the point. stupid slow fingers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.