At what orchestrates capital - causes it to continue operating and exchanged as informational schema and practices? If you rephrase it to temper the claim then you capitulate several of my points, and we start seeing alignment.
-
-
I guess we’ll see won’t we. Are you in the radical discontinuity (extinction) camp then Max?
-
Absolutely!
-
Are you actively working towards our extinction then? Is this a reason you enjoy the u/acc praxis, because it supports/complicit with this tendency towards annihilation?
-
What will it mean to be human when the computer-brain interface has zero or near zero latency? Is this the same human as today? I don't it.
-
That doesn’t follow, as the first people who will use such an interface will be disabled people who will do so to be human... normal.
-
And the next group of people? Technology that is used to bring the disabled to the level of the average will be used by the average to be geniuses. And the geniuses? What about the tech that helps the crippled walk? Would it stay at just that level?
-
Really? Its not the same thing. First You install the technology and then they have do the work 10,000 hours minimum... probably 20,000...
-
You are saying it's impossible for a technology to bridge the gap that practice or expertise work through.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.