First of all, only 34% of people in the poll say they have heard a lot of information about the ICE raids, so for the "average" voter it is not something directly on their radar, which suggests any follow-up questions do not register very deep opinions, and open to priming 2/
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
Second, the question primes the respondent by stating "These immigrants have outstanding court orders to be removed from the U.S" so the question is telling the respondent - hey these people SHOULD be deported, so it is not surprising that people agree with what they were told 3/
Afficher cette discussion -
Third, the same article reports: "Regardless of how voters felt about illegal immigration, six in 10 voters said that they felt immigrants who were in the U.S. legally make the country stronger, versus a quarter of voters who said they felt legal immigration is a burden." 4/
Afficher cette discussion -
Here, immigrants register a +36 positive advantage (60% to 24%) on making the country stronger. And when asked who you trust more to handle immigration, more people trust Democrats than Republicans in this same poll. 5/
Afficher cette discussion -
And finally, from the same poll: only 36% would vote to re-elect Trump compared to 53% who say they will vote for someone else - so whatever he is doing is NOT WORKING. 6/
Afficher cette discussion -
If the original question had been "Do you support immigration raids targeting people who have lived and worked in the U.S. for years and not committed any crimes, except they are undocumented...." then a clear majority would have OPPOSED the ICE Raids. This is polling 101 7/end
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Extremely worthwhile thread here
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
- Voir les réponses
-
-
-
Hey
@politico, STOP PUSH POLLING. You're better than this. -
Apparently not! Credibility is the coin of the realm for journalists and I fear Politico no longer has any - credibility or “journalists.”
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.

Co-founder
≠ endorsement 